NURS 6053 week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
The must make significant modifications to patient management, staffing, and resource allocation in order to meet the competing needs (Figueroa et al., 2019). 2019 (Figueroa et al.). Managing chronic illnesses reduces healthcare expenses since chronic diseases are more prevalent in the US than in other nations, particularly in the US. The population plagued by chronic ailments needs particular care, thus the government should hire enough nurses to help the people. By making more affordable treatment options available, promoting physical activity, improving medication adherence, and providing grants and money to advance healthcare, the health organizations in America can help to reduce the cost of healthcare (Crowley et al., 2020).
In conclusion, controlling chronic illnesses, increasing the number of resources available, and promoting healthy lifestyles are all necessary for achieving the healthcare goals put out. The workforce can be reduced if sufficient resources are gathered. Managing the competing needs had an impact before policies and practices were established in an organization.
How competing needs mayo address that issue
For many years, the United States’ healthcare system has relied on a fee-for-service payment system, in which each medical service and procedure is paid for separately. However, this payment model imposed several constraints, including increasing health-care costs, overtreatment, and overutilization while leaving others unserved and untreated. To counteract these perverse incentives, payment reform legislation focusing on methods that reflect providers’ performances, primarily quality, safety, and patient experience, has been put in place to replace the traditional fee-for-service system (Palumbo et al., 2017). The new healthcare payment reform is intended to increase provider efficiency, reducing unnecessary spending and, as a result, healthcare costs. However, competing needs such as the use of 12-hour shifts as an employee retention strategy, workforce, and resources have impacted the development and adoption of this critical policy as a result of the necessity to align with the payment reform agenda.
Payment reforms, such as Medicare, which promotes bundled payment, in which patients are required to use only one payment method for all episodes of care, must address nursing shortages.
With the aging population, Medicaid has been forced to become the primary payer of healthcare for many Americans. Because of their sheer numbers, nurses play a critical role in driving system change (Miller et al., 2017). It is estimated that over 3.8 million registered nurses were integrated into the American workforce as of 2019, a lower number when compared to the country’s health-care needs. As a result, the available nursing workforce is forced to work longer hours, lowering the quality, safety, and quantity of care provided (Rivers & Glover, 2008). There are numerous serious consequences associated with nurse shortages, such as work overload of available healthcare personnel, which leads to burnout and compromises patient safety, as well as long wait times, which may cause additional harm, including preventable deaths.
References:
Miller, B., Ross, K., Davis, M., Melek, S., Kathol, R., & Gordon, P. (2017). Payment reform in the patient-centered medical home: Enabling and sustaining integrated behavioral health care. American Psychologist, 72(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040448
Palumbo, M., Rambur, B., & Hart, V. (2017). Is health care payment reform impacting nurses’ work settings, roles, and education preparation?. Journal Of Professional Nursing, 33(6), 400-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.11.005
Rivers, P., & Glover, S. (2008). Health care competition, strategic mission, and patient satisfaction: research model and propositions. Journal Of Health Organization And Management, 22(6), 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260810916597
Question Description
I need an explanation for this Health & Medical question to help me study.
Also Read:
Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and leaders seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires establishing priorities and allocating resources accordingly
National Healthcare Issue/Stressor
Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the, resources, and patients are often in conflict. Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting personnel, and employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might lead to conflicting needs in practice.
Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and inaction. In this Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in Module 1 by addressing competing needs within your organization.
To Prepare:
Review the /stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding competing needs.
T
NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Posting |
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Main Post: Timeliness |
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
|
First Response |
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Second Response |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|