FPX 4000 Capella University Developing a Health Care Perspective Discussion

Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a 3-5-page paper.
Introduction
Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
• Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care.
• Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
• Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care.
• Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
• Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
• Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
• Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
• Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
• Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
• Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:
1. Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece to review the case studies you will be using for this assessment.
• Select the case most closely related to your area of interest and use it to complete the assessment.
• Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.
• Include the selected case study in your reference list, using proper APA Style and Format.
2. Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
• Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
• Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
• Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
• Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
• Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
• Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
3. Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
• In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide will help you locate appropriate references.
• Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
• Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.
• Assess the credibility of the information source.
• Assess the relevance of the information source.
4. Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
• Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
• Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
• Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
• Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
5. Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
• Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
• Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
• Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
6. Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
• Describe the proposed solution.
• Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
• Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
7. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
• Apply the principles of effective composition.
• Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
8. Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
• Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
• Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style

Developing a Health-Care Perspective Using Ethical Principles

Introduction

People in organizations perceive possible or existential challenges and make appropriate decisions to overcome them across the board. To resolve ethical challenges in the health care sector, care providers combine ethical decisions with the concepts of nonmaleficence, autonomy, fairness, and beneficence. Care providers are critical in ensuring that patients receive quality and focused care since they organize, oversee, and plan activities in health care facilities. In circumstances where there are clear ethical and moral difficulties, care providers work together and communicate effectively with patients to deliver ethical and high-quality care.

A Summary of the Case Study

Jenna and Chris Smith are taking an organic approach to parenthood because Ana, their five-day-old daughter, is their firstborn. They oppose Ana being vaccinated because they believe they have conducted ample research on vaccines and discovered that vaccines cause more harm than good (Case Study). They claim that immunizations cause autism in children based on what they’ve seen on parenting blogs. Dr. Kerr presents the benefits of vaccination as well as the risks and harms of not getting vaccinated after a lengthy discussion with the parents. She claims that trustworthy data and statistics show that immunization has resulted in a drop in child mortality over the last century. She illustrates how the FDA and CDC encourage parents to report probable vaccine adverse reactions as a method to allow for further research using VAERS (Case Study). In accordance with the Case Study, Dr. Kerr notifies Mr. and Mrs. Smith of the vaccine that causes autism in children’s inaccessibility. Furthermore, she emphasizes the importance of the vaccine not only to Ana, but also to the other children with whom she interacts. Vaccinating Ana, for example, prevents the spread of infectious diseases among young, immunocompromised, and genetically predisposed children. The Smiths, however, refuse the vaccine regardless of the information provided by Dr. Kerr. Dr. Kerr is then faced with a choice between respecting the parents’ decision and fulfilling her moral obligation as Ana’s physician.

Analyze the Case Study’s Ethical Issues

Dr. Kerr had an ethical problem after Ana’s parents refused to vaccinate her daughter. Dr. Kerr believes it is her responsibility as Ana’s pediatrician to provide therapies that would prevent Ana from contracting infections and disease through prophylactic interventions (Case Study; Dubé & MacDonald, 2017). The parents inform their health-care practitioner about their study on mommy-blogs concerning vaccination’s bad effects. Dr. Kerr educates the parents on vaccine myths and debates after carefully listening to their concerns. She uses approved research to back up her claims, and she tries to explain the vaccine’s benefits to Ana and other children who hang out with her. In contrast, the parents disregard every advice, claiming that their child should not be vaccinated. Due to Mr. and Mrs. Smith’s viewpoint, the care provider has an ethical issue because she realizes the importance of childhood immunization to an individual’s immunity.

Analyzing the Case Study Using the Ethical Decision Making Model

The ethical decision-making model is a useful tool for critical planning of prospective ethical issue solutions. Most of the time, health care workers use this tool to make an ethical judgment in instances where they are faced with a dilemma (Bianco et al., 2019). In the case of Ana’s immunization, moral judgment, moral awareness, and ethical behavior are ideal mechanisms for resolving the impasse between Dr. Kerr and Ana’s parents. The proclamation of the right mechanism to deal with an existential situation is known as moral judgment. It provides a foundation for assessing which characteristics are correct and which are incorrect. Moral awareness, as opposed to moral judgment, refers to people’s sensitivity to an individual’s values and personal morality. Moral judgment and moral awareness are required for a person to do the right thing, which refers to ethical action (O’Rourke, Thompson, & McMillan, 2019). In the case of Ana’s immunization, the health-care professional demonstrates moral awareness by informing the Smiths about the importance of communicable-disease vaccine. She also tries to teach them about the dangers of non-vaccination on Ana’s health and the health of the children she knows. Ana should be vaccinated, according to Dr. Kerr, because of her ethical behavior.

The Case Study’s Communication Approaches’ Effectiveness

Because she is Ana’s pediatrician, Dr. Kerr becomes the link between Ana and her parents in terms of health care. Ana is unable to make decisions regarding her therapy, therefore she and her parents must communicate efficiently in order to choose the best treatment option. Jenna and Chris express their reluctance in the immunization because of the relation to autism in the interaction between the care provider and the parents, indicating the likelihood of good communication. The care professional tries to persuade the parents that there is no existential vaccine that may prevent children from developing autism. Regardless of communication, both sides show a willingness to choose Ana’s best option. On that note, they must successfully communicate and comprehend each other in order to provide an appropriate therapy choice for the youngster. Dr. Kerr showed respect for Mr. and Mrs. Chris’ decision by informing them about the need of children vaccinations. Dr. Kerr advised Ana’s parents about her viewpoint and the importance of the immunization as Ana’s primary care provider. Communication between a patient and his or her representative with the care provider promotes knowledge about the patient’s health status as a means of creating trust. Hatoková, Masaryk, and Tnyiová (2018) suggest that in the event of a disagreement between care providers and parents over a child’s treatment, the parents may choose to seek alternate support from a different care provider or search the Internet for viable answers. As a result, efficient communication between physicians and parents allows for the delivery of high-quality, devoted, and prompt care.

Applying Ethical Principles to Resolve the Ethical Dilemma

Ana’s story illustrates the four ethical decision-making principles of beneficence, autonomy, fairness, and nonmaleficence. Dr. Kerr demonstrates an interest in ensuring Ana obtains the immunization based on the principle of beneficence. To protect Ana’s autonomy, she sticks to Ana’s parents’ interests. Dr. Kerr listens to the Smiths objectively and without prejudice in order to establish justice. Dr. Kerr should allow the parents additional time to decide on Ana’s vaccine to resolve the ethical dilemma. Furthermore, she should provide materials to the parents so that they can learn more about vaccines and potentially approve Ana’s immunization.

Conclusion

The ethical decision-making model and health-care ethics principles provide an ideal mechanism for resolving existing ethical challenges, particularly in the health-care industry. Furthermore, excellent communication between parents and caregivers minimizes the likelihood of ethical conflicts. The care provider properly talked with Mr. and Mrs. Smith in Ana’s situation and later gave additional options before Ana’s vaccination. The pediatrician’s interest in involving the parents’ decisions in the treatment of their five-day-old kid is evident in this case. Dr. Kerr was able to follow the standards of health-care ethics in this way.