Health Regulatory Agencies in The United States Case Study Essay

Health Regulatory Agencies in The United States Case Study Essay

Health Regulatory Agencies in The United States Case Study Essay

Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system within the US, create a table listing your 5 regulatory agencies and address the following:

Describe the agency, level of regulatory authority (local, state, federal), scope of regulatory authority, and role within the US healthcare system.
Address relevance of the organization or the organization’s authority to the APRN/DNP graduate.
Describe relevance to specialty area, area of practice, or setting of practice. For an example, mental health.
Submission Requirements:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

In the table, write the 3 criteria above and respond to them.
The table is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
The table is to be complete and thorough. It should include all items indicated in the assignment.
Incorporate at least 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. null
Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Rubric
Essay/Paper Rubric

Essay/Paper Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues/Problems

4.0 pts
Distinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

3.0 pts
Excellent

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

2.0 pts
Fair

Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

1.0 pts
Poor

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

4.0 pts
Distinguished

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

3.0 pts
Excellent

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

2.0 pts
Fair

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

1.0 pts
Poor

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4.0 pts
Distinguished

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3.0 pts
Excellent

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2.0 pts
Fair

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1.0 pts
Poor

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

4.0 pts
Distinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3.0 pts
Excellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2.0 pts
Fair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1.0 pts
Poor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

4.0 pts
Full Marks

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3.0 pts
Excellent

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2.0 pts
Fair

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1.0 pts
Poor

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

4.0 pt