NHS-FP 6004 Assessment 2:Policy Proposal Essay

NHS-FP 6004 Assessment 2:Policy Proposal Essay

Policy Proposal Essay

An organizational benchmark is required for monitoring quality improvement, and underperformance can impair the provision of quality care and the organization’s operations, making it critical to implement policies and practice guidelines to enhance performance in these areas. This proposal aims to ensure the provision of excellent treatment that satisfies the requirements specified by local, state, or federal health care regulations, as well as to enhance the organization’s performance in the designated benchmark areas, including HbA1c tests and diabetic foot exams. A proposal to analyze the possible effects of environmental elements and propose ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to enhance targeted benchmark performance is required to modify policies to improve care.

The Need for Creating a Policy and Practice

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NHS-FP 6004 Assessment 2:Policy Proposal Essay

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

To ensure that patients receive excellent treatment and that the organization functions effectively, it is critical to develop policy and practice guidelines to overcome a deficiency in reaching a benchmark metric set by local, state, and federal healthcare policies and regulations. The present organizational standard and the numerical score for underperformance must be thoroughly analyzed to determine the areas that require improvement. The falling Hgba1c test and poor foot examination rate to avoid diabetic problems are the benchmark underperformance indicators for this organization. The underperformance of the benchmark has the potential to impact the organization’s operations and the provision of excellent care in a variety of ways. A decrease in Hgba1c examinations could result in individuals not obtaining proper diabetic therapy, resulting in health complications. The low incidence of foot examination may result in missed possibilities to prevent and manage foot problems, which are frequent among diabetics.

Increased healthcare expenses, poor patient satisfaction, and decreased patient outcomes are all potential consequences of not making any adjustments. The drop in Hgba1c examinations and low foot examination rate underscores the need for policy and practice guidance to address this benchmark underperformance. The drop in Hgba1c checks means that patients are not receiving the necessary level of care and the low incidence of foot examinations shows that opportunities to prevent and control diabetic problems are being lost (Attal et al., 2019). The organization can guarantee that patients receive the right level of care and that chances to prevent and treat diabetes complications are not missed by establishing policy and practice standards.

Current Benchmark For The Organization And The Numeric Score For The Underperformance

According to the performance dashboard indicators in Assessment 1, the current benchmark for the organization is falling short in two areas: Hgba1c exam and the foot examination rate. The numerical score for the Hgba1c exam underperformance entails a sharp rise from the second quarter of 2020, 58% to 78% in the 3rd quarter, and a further steep decline of 8% to end the year at 64%. The low foot examination rate has been steadily declining from the first quarter of 2020 to 48 % by the end of the third quarter to a slight increase of  14% to end the year at 62%.

How the Benchmark Underperformance Potentially Affecting The Provision Of Quality Care Or The Operations Of The Organization

Underperformance in the Hgba1c exam and foot examination rate could have a substantial influence on the organization’s quality of care. The Hgba1c test is vital for diabetes treatment since it assesses a patient’s average blood sugar level over the previous two to three months. A decrease in Hgba1c exam rates can signify that diabetic patients are not receiving proper treatment and may be at risk for diabetes-related problems, including neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy (Attal et al., 2019). This can result in higher healthcare expenses, more hospitalizations, and lower patient satisfaction. Similarly, a low incidence of foot examination might have harmful repercussions for diabetic patients. Foot exams are critical in preventing and treating foot issues, which are frequent among diabetics. A low incidence of foot examination might suggest that patients are not receiving proper foot care and are at risk of foot ulcers and amputations. This can result in higher healthcare expenses, less mobility and independence, and lower patient satisfaction.

Potential Repercussions of not Making any Changes

If the organization does not take action to address the benchmark underperformance, the quality of care delivered to patients may continue to decline, resulting in adverse patient outcomes and a drop in patient satisfaction. This, in turn, can lead to lower income and diminished community confidence in the organization (Shamim et al., 2021). Noncompliance with benchmark requirements established by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or legislation may also result in sanctions and reduced funding possibilities for the organization.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Proof that Backs Up My Claims

The data on the performance dashboard clearly shows a drop in the Hgba1c exam and foot examination rate, which supports the conclusions. This decrease is also supported by relevant literature and research demonstrating the usefulness of frequent Hgba1c and foot examinations in the prevention and management of diabetes-related problems. Relevant studies and industry data also indicate the potential implications of not making any adjustments, such as decreasing patient satisfaction, lost revenue, and penalties for noncompliance.

 Summary of the Proposed Organizational Policy and Practice Guidelines

The recommended organizational policy and practice guidelines aim to solve the performance dashboard indicators’ observed benchmark underperformance in the Hgba1c exam and foot examination rate (Herman et al., 2023). The relevant performance criteria addressed by the policy proposal are mandated by local, state, or federal healthcare policies or laws and include

  1. Ensuring staff members get regular education and training to ensure they understand the relevance of Hgba1c tests and foot assessments in preventing diabetic complications.
  2. Implementation of a solid system for tracking and monitoring Hgba1c and foot examination performance.
  3. Allocation of sufficient resources, including personnel and equipment, to enable the delivery of Hgba1c and foot exams.
  4. Policy and practice recommendations should be reviewed and evaluated regularly to verify their usefulness in enhancing benchmark performance.

The proposed policy is intended to guarantee that the organization complies with appropriate local, state, or federal healthcare rules or legislation while simultaneously providing patients with high-quality treatment (Herman et al., 2023). The organization must improve its benchmark performance, improve patient outcomes, and retain its commitment to providing quality healthcare services by applying these recommendations.

Effects of Environmental Factors on the Recommended Practice Guidelines

There are many important factors to bear in mind while considering the possible influence of environmental factors on proposed practice recommendations. First, regulatory factors must be considered. The suggested practice guidelines must follow all applicable local, state, and federal healthcare rules and legislation. This covers legislation governing patient privacy, data gathering, reporting, and patient care and treatment recommendations. Failure to comply with these standards may result in penalties, legal ramifications, and reputational damage to the organization. Aside from regulatory considerations, the availability of resources is also crucial. The suggested practice guidelines may require additional human resources, financial resources, and logistical concerns, such as physical space and support services (Herman et al., 2023). The company must ensure that it has the resources necessary to adopt and maintain the suggested guidelines. This entails hiring and training new employees, collecting appropriate money, and ensuring adequate physical space and support services are available.

Finally, the community’s cultural variety must be considered. The recommended practice standards must consider the patient population’s specific requirements and viewpoints, including variances in language, cultural norms, and beliefs (Herman et al., 2023). This necessitates cultural awareness and competency on the part of the organization’s employees, as well as a commitment to provide culturally appropriate treatment to all patients.

Ethical and Evidence-based Practice Guidelines

Several ways for improving performance for the specified benchmark are proposed in the (American Diabetes Association (2020) as evidence-based literature. For example, to enhance the Hgba1c exam, the proposed intervention is frequent monitoring of patients alongside education on the necessity of maintaining good blood sugar levels. This may be accomplished by setting up frequent visits with diabetes educators, sending out patient reminders, and offering patient-friendly instructional materials. To increase the incidence of foot examinations, American Diabetes Association (2020) proposes that diabetic patients have frequent foot exams and that patients be educated on the necessity of maintaining excellent foot health. This can be accomplished by including frequent foot exams in the patient’s treatment plan and teaching correct foot care procedures.

To ensure that these techniques are ethical and culturally inclusive in their implementation, they must take into account patients’ different cultural backgrounds and adjust training materials and interventions to their unique requirements (Chien et al., 2022). This entails working with neighborhood groups, employing cultural brokers, or giving instruction in many languages. The immediate impact of these changes on stakeholders’ work environments and job needs will almost certainly result in a greater burden for diabetes educators and healthcare professionals, as well as the need for extra resources such as staff and financing. On the other hand, the potential advantages of improved health outcomes and higher patient satisfaction should be factored into the decision-making process.

Stakeholders’ Involvement in Further Development and Implementation Proposed Policy and Practice Guidelines

It is critical to involve stakeholders and groups in the ongoing development and execution of the proposed policy and practice guidelines since they are critical to the policy’s success. The participation of various stakeholders and groups can result in a more complete and successful policy that benefits everyone in the company and community. Patients are the first stakeholders who must be included. They are the recipients of healthcare services, and their experiences and input are critical in assessing the policy’s efficacy (Rodrigues et al., 2020). Patients’ participation may assist in ensuring that the proposed policy meets their needs and expectations and provide useful input into how the policy might be improved.

Healthcare professionals and personnel are another set of stakeholders that must be included since any policy changes will directly touch them. Additionally, their involvement is critical in ensuring that the policy is realistic, practicable, and implementable. Involving healthcare professionals and workers may also ensure that the policy meets the issues and obstacles they experience daily, as well as creating buy-in and commitment to the policy. Healthcare organizations, government agencies, and other relevant entities must be included as the third set of stakeholders (Rodrigues et al., 2020). These groups have a substantial effect on the healthcare system and can assist in putting the strategy into action. Their participation may ensure that the policy is consistent with more profound healthcare policies and efforts, as well as help overcome any obstacles that may develop during implementation.

Strategies for Collaborating with the Stakeholder Group to Implement Proposed Policy and Practice Guidelines

The stakeholder group is critical to the successful implementation of the suggested policy and practice standards. Their cooperation is crucial for effective implementation because it guarantees that everyone is on the same page and working toward the same objective. Stakeholders can contribute useful input and recommendations to enhance policy and practice standards (Muchiri et al., 2018). They may also assist in identifying any issues or hurdles that may occur during implementation and working together to find solutions to these challenges. Several ways for collaborating with the stakeholder group during the implementation phase exist.

Foremost, regular communication is essential. It is critical to keep stakeholders informed and up to date on the implementation process’s progress (Muchiri et al., 2018). This can be accomplished via frequent meetings, email updates, or a dedicated website or portal. Second, including stakeholders in the planning and decision-making process is critical. Focus groups, questionnaires, and one-on-one sessions can all be used to accomplish this. Stakeholders can contribute useful insights and views that can aid in the refinement of policy and practice standards. Finally, it is critical to equip the stakeholder group with the appropriate resources and assistance to enable effective implementation. This might include chances for training and professional development, access to appropriate information and resources, and assistance from relevant departments and teams inside the business.

Conclusion

Addressing the benchmark underperformance in the Hgba1c exam and foot examination rate is critical for maintaining excellent treatment and seamless organization operations. The recommended policy and practice guidelines are supported by evidence-based research and are in accordance with local, state, and federal healthcare policies and legislation. The involvement of important stakeholders and groups is critical to the success of the proposed changes, and their engagement with the organization is critical to the policy’s successful implementation. The suggested adjustments are intended to have a favorable influence on the stakeholders’ work environment and job requirements by adopting ethical and culturally inclusive practices.

References

American Diabetes Association. (2020). Improving care and promoting health in populations: Standards of Medical Care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care43(Suppl 1), S7–S13. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S001

Attal, S., Mahmoud, M. H., Aseel, M. T., Candra, A., Amuna, P., Elnagmi, M., Abdallah, M., Ismail, N., Abdelrazek, A., Albaw, D., Albashir, A., & Elmahdi, H. (2019). Indicators of quality of clinical care for type 2 diabetes patients in primary health care centers in Qatar: A retrospective analysis. International Journal of Endocrinology2019, 3519093. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3519093

Chien, L. J., Slade, D., Dahm, M. R., Brady, B., Roberts, E., Goncharov, L., Taylor, J., Eggins, S., & Thornton, A. (2022). Improving patient-centered care through a tailored intervention addressing nursing clinical handover communication in its organizational and cultural context. Journal of Advanced Nursing78(5), 1413–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15110

Herman, W. H., Bullock, A., Boltri, J. M., Conlin, P. R., Greenlee, M. C., Lopata, A. M., Powell, C., Tracer, H., & Schillinger, D. (2023). The National Clinical Care Commission report to Congress: Background, methods, and foundational recommendations. Diabetes Care46(2), e14–e23. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-0611

Muchiri, J. W., Gericke, G. J., & Rheeder, P. (2018). Stakeholders’ perceptions of dietary and related self-management challenges and education program preferences for type 2 diabetes adults. Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa24(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/16089677.2018.1541211

Rodrigues, A. M., Haste, A., Penn, L., Bell, R., Summerbell, C., White, M., Adamson, A. J., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2020). Stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of the National Health Service diabetes prevention program in England: a qualitative study with service users, intervention providers and deliverers, commissioners, and referrers. BMC Health Services Research20(1), 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05160-2

Shamim, M., Alhakbani, M. S. A., Alqahtani, M. S. B., Alharthi, O. S. O., & Alhaqbani, Y. J. N. (2021). Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding diabetic foot care among Saudi and non-Saudi diabetic patients in Alkharj. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care10(2), 859–864. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1681_20

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Assessment 2 Instructions: Policy Proposal
• PRINT
• Write a 4-6 page policy proposal and practice guidelines for improving quality and performance associated with the benchmark metric underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1.
Introduction
In advocating for institutional policy changes related to local, state, or federal health care laws or policies, health leaders must be able to develop and present clear and well-written policy and practice guideline proposals that will enable a team, a unit, or an organization as a whole to resolve relevant performance issues and bring about improvements in the quality and safety of health care. This assessment offers you an opportunity to take the lead in proposing such changes.
As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice on policy development, both inside and outside your care setting. Developing policy for internal purposes can be a valuable process toward quality and safety improvement, as well as ensuring compliance with various health care regulatory pressures. This assessment offers you an opportunity to take the lead in proposing such changes.
Instructions
Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions.
Requirements
The policy proposal requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
• Explain the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws.
o What is the current benchmark for the organization and the numeric score for the underperformance?
o How is the benchmark underperformance potentially affecting the provision of quality care or the operations of the organization?
o What are the potential repercussions of not making any changes?
o What evidence supports your conclusions?
• Summarize your proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines.
o Identify applicable local, state, or federal health care policy or law that prescribes relevant performance benchmarks that your policy proposal addresses.
o Keep your audience in mind when creating this summary.
• Analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on your recommended practice guidelines.
o What regulatory considerations could affect your recommended guidelines?
o What resources could affect your recommended guidelines (staffing, financial, and logistical considerations, or support services)?
• Explain ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance and the impact the proposed changes will have on the targeted group.
o What does the evidence-based literature suggest are potential strategies to improve performance for your targeted benchmark?
o How would these strategies ensure performance improvement or compliance with applicable local, state, or federal health care policy or law?
o How can you ensure that these strategies are ethical and culturally inclusive in their application?
o What is the direct impact of these changes on the stakeholders’ work setting and job requirements?
• Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of your proposed policy and practice guidelines.
o Why is it important to engage these stakeholders and groups?
o How can their participation produce a stronger policy and facilitate its implementation?
• Present strategies for collaborating with the stakeholder group to implement your proposed policy and practice guidelines.
o What role will the stakeholder group play in implementing your proposal?
o Why is the stakeholder group and their collaboration important for successful implementation?
• Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
o Proofread your proposal, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your proposal.
• Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from external sources.
o Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.
Policy Proposal Format and Length
It may be helpful to use a template or format for your proposal that is used in your current organization. The risk management or quality department could be a good resource for finding an appropriate template or format. If you are not currently in practice, or your organization does not have these resources, many appropriate templates are freely available on the Internet.
Your policy should be succinct (about one paragraph). Overall, your proposal should be 4–6 pages in length.
Supporting Evidence
Cite 3–5 references to relevant research, case studies, or best practices to support your analysis and recommendations.
Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your policy proposal to your ePortfolio.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
• Competency 1: Analyze relevant health care laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.
o Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws.
• Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.
o Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines.
• Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform health care laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.
o Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change.
• Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.
o Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes.
o Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.
• Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
o Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
o Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Policy Proposal Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Explain and interpret for stakeholders the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws. Does not explain the rationale for a policy and practice guidelines addressing benchmark underperformance. Explains the rationale for a policy and practice guidelines addressing benchmark underperformance, irrespective of a particular need. Explains the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws, but does not relate to stakeholders. Explains the need for creating a policy and practice guidelines to address a shortfall in meeting a benchmark metric prescribed by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws. Clearly articulates the effects of benchmark underperformance and draws sound conclusions about the potential repercussions of inaction, based on credible evidence and relates information to stakeholder group.
Summarize a proposed organizational policy or practice change guideline and analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines. Does not summarize a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines or identify environmental factors that can affect recommended practice guidelines. Provides a summary that paints an unclear picture of a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines or does not expand on environmental factors that can affect recommended practice guidelines. Summarizes a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines. Analyzes the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines. Succinctly summarizes a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines. Analyzes the potential effects of environmental factors on recommended practice guidelines. Identifies clear cause-and-effect relationships and the influence of those factors on specific recommendations.
Explain how ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance will impact a stakeholder group needed for successful implementation of the policy or practice change. Does not recommend practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance or identify how it will affect the stakeholder group’s work. Recommends practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance that will affect the stakeholder group’s work. Recommends ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance. Explains how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will affect how a stakeholder group does its work. Recommends ethical, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance. Provides an honest and accurate assessment of practice changes and their precise impact on stakeholders. Provides clear and compelling justification, substantiated by credible evidence.
Explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes. Does not explain why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes. Identifies stakeholders and groups who are not the most logical choices to be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines and implementation of a proposed policy or practice change to improve quality and outcomes. Explains why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines change to improve quality and outcomes. Provides a perceptive and succinct explanation of why particular stakeholders and groups must be involved in further development and implementation of a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Offers clear and convincing rationale for stakeholder and group engagement and how it strengthens policy and facilitates changes in practice to improve quality outcomes.
Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Does not present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Presents stakeholder collaboration strategies for implementing a proposed policy and practice guidelines that lack clear relevance or insight into the positions and perspectives of the stakeholder group. Presents strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Presents strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Makes a compelling case for the importance of stakeholder collaboration and considers stakeholder perspectives by addressing possible objections.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Does not organize content for ideas to flow logically with smooth transitions. Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Organizes content so clarity is enhanced and all ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Does not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Sources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.

 

 

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NHS-FP 6004 Assessment 2:Policy Proposal Essay

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?