NR 451 Week 6: Capstone Project: Milestone 3: Educating Staff

NR 451 Week 6: Capstone Project: Milestone 3 Rubric

NR451_Milestone3
NR451_Milestone3
Criteria Ratings Pts

The Problem

Summary of change model discussed. Practice Issue is stated. Scope of the problem includes statistics as it relates to your work area and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen is discussed as is logical.

30.0 pts

Summary of change model and Practice issued addressed Statistical information as it relates to work area, scope of problem to healthcare as a whole, discussed. Team, stakeholders and role/reason chosen is discussed and is logical.

26.0 pts

Summary of change model and Practice issued addressed Statistical information as it relates to work area is missing and scope of problem to healthcare discussed. Team, stakeholders and their role/reason chosen is discussed and is logical.

24.0 pts

Summary of change model discussed and Practice issued addressed Statistical information as it relates to work area is missing and scope of problem to healthcare discussed minimally. Team, stakeholders and their role/reason chosen discussed and is logical.

11.0 pts

Summary of change model is not discussed however, Practice issued is addressed Statistical information as it relates to work area is missing and scope of problem to healthcare discussed Team and stakeholders stated but role/reason chosen is not discussed.

0.0 pts

None of the elements were present.
30.0 pts

The Evidence

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes of the multiple views given in the Systematic Review. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered.

35.0 pts

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes the author/s pull from the multiple articles in the Systematic Review. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered.

31.0 pts

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes. Pertinent information is in paragraph as one overriding theme pulled from the Systematic Review. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered.

28.0 pts

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of individual authors within the article. Pertinent information is not summarized. Sources listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered.

13.0 pts

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms individual authors. Pertinent information is not summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered.

0.0 pts

There is no discussion of the evidence.
35.0 pts

The Plan

Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.

35.0 pts

Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.

31.0 pts

Plan of action described but not all important elements included. OR Timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements.

28.0 pts

Plan of action described but not all important elements included AND Timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements.

13.0 pts

Plan of action is present but not logical and is incomplete. The timeline is not appropriate or logical.

0.0 pts

Plan of action is not present. The timeline is not present.
35.0 pts

The Nurse’s Role

The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise.

25.0 pts

The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise.

22.0 pts

The nurses’ role is described but not clear. OR Procedures are discussed but not clear.

20.0 pts

The nurses’ role is described but not clear. AND Procedures are discussed but not clear.

10.0 pts

The nurse’s roles are not appropriate. Procedures are not clearly written and are incomplete.

0.0 pts

Nurses’ roles are absent. Procedures are absent.
25.0 pts

Resources

Form for tracking the outcomes during pilot plan is included. Resources the nurses will need to help implement the plan are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included.

20.0 pts

Form for tracking outcomes during pilot study is included. Resources (to help with the project) the nurses need are included. At least three resources included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources is included.

18.0 pts

Form for tracking outcomes included. At least three resources the nurses need to help with the project are included but the resources were not the best suited resources for the project.

16.0 pts

Form for tracking outcomes included but was not well-developed. At least two resources are included but are not included for the duration of the project.

8.0 pts

Form for tracking outcomes is poorly developed. Only one resource is listed.

0.0 pts

Form for tracking outcomes is absent No appropriate resources are listed.
20.0 pts

Summary

Summary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals in terms of success.

10.0 pts

Summary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals.

9.0 pts

Summary slide reiterates the problem AND purpose. Goals are stated but are not referenced in terms of success.

8.0 pts

Summary slide reiterates the problem OR the purpose, but not both. Goals are stated.

4.0 pts

Summary slide reiterates the problem OR the purpose, but not both. Goals are not mentioned.

0.0 pts

Summary slide is not shown
10.0 pts

Overall Presentation

Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read. Speaker notes are present.

20.0 pts

Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing and includes creativity. Font is easy to read.

18.0 pts

Presentation is accurate and covers most elements.

16.0 pts

Presentation content is accurate and can be followed, but it lacks flow and creativity.

8.0 pts

Presentation lacks organization. Creativity is difficult to follow.

0.0 pts

Presentation lacks any attempt at organization and comes across as chaotic.
20.0 pts

Mechanics

Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations. Evidence of spell and grammar check.

25.0 pts

Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References properly cited within the presentation. Reference slide includes all citations within the PowerPoint presentation. Evidence of spell and grammar check.

22.0 pts

Title slide is incomplete. Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted. References are present, with minimal errors in format within the PowerPoint presentation. Citations are present but not correct format.

20.0 pts

Missing title slide Multiple grammar and punctuation errors noted. References do not include all citations within the PowerPoint presentation.

10.0 pts

The title slide is missing. The references are improperly formatted and are incomplete within the PowerPoint presentation. Errors in spelling and grammar are evident.

0.0 pts

Title slide and citations are missing. References are missing. No evidence of proof-reading prior to submitting assignment.
25.0 pts
Total Points: 200

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 451 Week 6: Capstone Project: Milestone 3: Educating Staff

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?