NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion – RN PHI Responsibility

NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion – RN PHI Responsibility

NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion – RN PHI Responsibility

​According to the American Nurses Association (ANA), protecting a patient’s …

PHI and Portable Devices

   HealthIT.gov recommends NOT using portable storage devices to transport PHI due to the … NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion – RN PHI Responsibility

My Facility and PHI

   University Hospital is a Magnet hospital, and it prides itself on using the best evidence-based … NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion – RN PHI Responsibility

NURS 6051 Week 11 Assignment (Walden)

Data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum

ata/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum

As a registered nurse (RN), working in an intensive critical care unit (ICU) is seen as the zenith of clinical skills and knowledge. Every day, you are continuously faced with critical decisions

Clinical Question

Will obtaining the CCRN certificate lead to nurses in the ICU obtaining more critical care knowledge that can lead to wisdom in their role as a nurse?

Data and Information

The American Nurses Association (ANA) define data as “discrete entities that are described

CCRN Search

Knowledge on the CCRN

Transforming CCRN knowledge to Critical Care Wisdom. NURS 6051 Weekly Discussions and Assignments

NURS 6051 Week 11 Discussion (Walden)

Health Literacy Responsibility

​According to the U. S. Department of Health and Services (HSS), all public health care …

Patient Resource to Evaluate Information

​One of the best online resources for both patients and health care professionals is the …

Additional Strategies

​According to a 2016 Gallup poll, nurses are once again seen as the most trusted and …

NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER (Walden)

A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile

Walden University:  Nursing 6051, Section 9

A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile 

Clostridium difficile has been found to be the main cause of gastrointestinal-related death …

Health Literacy Promotion Among Patients

The attached brochure was created for the sake of increasing health literacy and …

Conclusion

Since C. diff has the potential to kill or significantly disturb the health of patients, it is ..

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_5051_Week4_ Application_ Rubric

Grid View

List View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.	Points:Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)No purpose statement was provided. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.	Points:Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.	Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.	Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation NURS 6051 Week 4 Discussion – Innovative Technology	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback