NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Essay

NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Essay

Dashboard Metrics Evaluation 

Evaluate Dashboard Metrics Associated With Benchmarks Set Forth By Local, State, Or Federal Health Care Laws Or Policies

Given the number of patients that attend the mercy medical center, a villa health-affiliated hospital institution, the diabetes facility is most likely medium-sized. With 36,192 patients visiting the facility, the facility’s size will likely need a significant number of healthcare experts and support workers to oversee patient care and ensure the facility’s smooth functioning.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Essay

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

The gender distribution of the hospital’s patients, with 17,957 men and 18,235 females, demonstrates that the facility serves a broad patient population. This information can help in identifying the patients’ requirements and adapting care to match those needs. It should be noted that this data is based on a snapshot of patient visits and does not offer a comprehensive picture of the facility’s size or patient demographics. To properly comprehend the size and operations of the diabetic facility, further information such as the number of healthcare professionals and support staff, the size of the facility, and patient demographics over a longer period would be necessary.

With 12,126 patients, people under the age of 20 constitute the biggest group of patients. The next highest age group, with 14,732 patients, is those between the ages of 21 and 44. There is a smaller group of patients between the ages of 45 and 64, with 6,099 patients, and those above the age of 65, with 2,371 patients. The patient population’s racial demographics are diversified, with white patients constituting the biggest proportion (28,537). There are also a large number of African American patients (1,601), Asian patients (3,822), Hispanic/Latino patients (2,890), American Indian patients (433), and other races patients, constituting (11,661).

Which Metrics Are Not Meeting The Benchmark For The Organization?

Based on the performance dashboard examination, two of the measures do not match the bar set by local, state, or federal healthcare laws or regulations. These measures are a reduced HbA1c exam and a low incidence of foot examination to prevent diabetic complications. The HbA1c test, which assesses a patient’s average blood sugar level over the previous two to three months, does not satisfy the lower threshold. The highest organization’s average HbA1c score is 78%, indicating that some of the patients may be at an elevated risk for diabetic complications such as nerve damage, heart disease, and stroke (Casadei et al., 2021).

Similarly, the low foot examination rate falls short of the target of 100%. Only 75% of our diabetic patients had foot examinations in 2020, which is crucial for preventing diabetes-related foot problems, including amputations. These findings emphasize the need to address these underperformance areas and enhance the overall quality of care provided to our patients. This may entail providing our patients with extra knowledge and resources, collaborating with our interprofessional team to ensure that all patients receive regular foot inspections, and investigating novel solutions like telemedicine or community outreach initiatives (Casadei et al., 2021).

What Are The Local, State, Or Federal Health Care Policies Or Laws That Establish These Benchmarks?

The benchmarks, that is, declining HbA1c exam and low foot examination rate to prevent diabetes complications, may be established by various local, state, or federal health care policies or laws. The legislation covers diabetes management and care restrictions, quality improvement programs, and patient safety and protection. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), for example, has created quality monitoring and reporting systems for diabetes treatment, such as the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program, at the federal level (MDPP) (Berdahl et al., 2021). These programs provide guidelines for HbA1c testing frequency and diabetes self-management education. Individual state departments of health or medical boards may have rules requiring specific diabetes treatment procedures, such as frequent foot checks for diabetic patients, at the state level.

What Conclusions Can You Draw From Your Evaluation?

Based on the performance dashboard evaluation, it is possible to conclude that the organization is having difficulty meeting the benchmark set forward by local, state, as well as federal healthcare laws and policies in two crucial aspects: the declining HbA1c exam and the low foot examination rate to prevent diabetes complications. These findings show a need for enhancement in diabetes care delivery as well as overall patient care quality. Addressing these areas of weakness will assist in lowering the risk of diabetes-related comorbidities and better patient outcomes (Appil et al., 2022).

Are There Any Unknowns, Missing Information, Unanswered Questions, Or Areas Of Uncertainty Where Additional Information Could Improve Your Evaluation?

There are various missing pieces of information; for example, the causes of low HbA1c levels are unknown why the frequency of HbA1c tests has decreased. Again, the data supplied does not reveal the causes for the low foot screening rate. Possible contributors to this trend include a lack of access to care, patient noncompliance, and poor provider education, all of which must be addressed (Amini-Rarani et al., 2022). Other factors that are most likely influencing the overall quality of diabetes treatment in the organization are also not addressed. A thorough assessment that takes into account all areas of diabetes care, such as patient education, access to treatment, and interprofessional collaboration, might offer a full picture of the situation (Amini-Rarani et al., 2022). It would be useful to compare the organization’s performance to that of other comparable organizations to see if the underperformance is unique to this organization or if it is indicative of a larger trend in the healthcare system. Furthermore, it remains unknown what impact any initiatives to enhance HbA1c tests and foot examination rates would have. Additional research is needed to aid in determining the most effective techniques for improvement.

Analyze The Consequence Of Not Meeting Prescribed Benchmarks And The Impact This Has On Health Care Organizations Or Teams

Failure to fulfill the mandated benchmark set by government laws and rules can result in various penalties for healthcare organizations. If an organization fails to reach the established criteria, its mission and vision may be jeopardized. For example, if an organization’s objective is to offer high-quality treatment to all patients, failure to satisfy diabetes care benchmarks may suggest that the institution is not meeting its mission. To add to the legal consequences, if the organization fails to reach the required goals, it may face legal implications (American Diabetes Association, 2020). For example, if the organization does not do routine foot checks on diabetic patients, it may violate state or federal laws or rules.

Failure to reach the stipulated benchmarks may result in reduced funding or fines for the organization. This might affect the organization’s financial stability and hinder its ability to care for people. Failing to reach the established criteria may have a detrimental influence on the organization’s reputation (American Diabetes Association, 2020). As a result, patient satisfaction may suffer, as well as faith in the organization’s capacity to offer quality treatment, leading to failure to impact poor patient outcomes. For example, if the organization does not provide regular foot checks to diabetic patients, the chance of foot problems and other major health conditions increases.

Staffing: If a company fails to reach the specified criteria, it may face staffing shortages or issues whereby, if the company does not provide frequent diabetic eye exams, it may not have the availability of an ophthalmologist. At the same time, if criteria are not met, the organization’s operating and capital financing may be reduced. This might impact the organization’s capacity to deliver quality treatment to patients while also maintaining the required resources and personnel. Failure to reach benchmarks may impact support services such as pharmacy, cleaning, and nutritional services. This might lead to care delivery delays or inefficiencies. Considering community cultural diversity, failure to satisfy the benchmark may result in differences in the quality of treatment for different cultural groups in the community. This might influence the organization’s capacity to deliver culturally relevant treatment and preserve community trust. Failure to achieve standards may result in a lack of staff skills and training, which may influence the quality of care offered to patients.

What Are The Challenges That May Potentially Contribute To Benchmark Underperformance?

Lack of resources, insufficient staffing levels, limited financial funding (both operational and capital), insufficient physical space, limited support services, cultural diversity within the community, and gaps in staff skills or procedures and processes are all potential contributors to benchmark underperformance (Buitinga et al., 2020). My judgments are based on assumptions such as the availability of data and information about the organization’s performance and resources and an awareness of the local, state, and federal laws and policies that set the benchmarks. Furthermore, community cultural, social, and economic elements may contribute to benchmark underperformance. It is critical to recognize that unknown factors or missing information may influence the overall evaluation of the organization’s performance. More research and data collecting may be required to fully comprehend the difficulties and potential solutions for benchmark underperformance.

Evaluate a Benchmark Underperformance In A Heath Care Organization Or Interprofessional Team That Has The Potential For Greatly Improving Overall Quality Or Performance.

Based on the data, the most widespread underperformance that impacts the biggest number of patients is the dropping Hgba1c exam and low foot examination rate to prevent diabetic problems. This underperformance will have a significant impact on the population served by the organization by raising the risk of diabetes-related complications and, as a result, severely influencing patient outcomes. It is critical to prioritize improving the Hgba1c exam and foot examination rate to prevent diabetic problems to enhance the overall quality of care and performance. Increased availability of resources, including people, finance, and physical space, to enable frequent Hgba1c exams and foot examinations is one possible option to enhance the overall quality of treatment and performance (American Diabetes Association, 2020).

Additionally, additional training for employees may be required to ensure that they have the requisite abilities to conduct these tests efficiently. Another possibility is to form alliances with community groups to raise awareness of the relevance of these tests and give resources to individuals who may not have access to them. The organization may considerably enhance the overall quality of care, performance, and patient outcomes by addressing the dropping Hgba1c exam and low foot examination rate.

Advocate For Ethical And Sustainable Action(S), Directed Toward An Appropriate Group Of Stakeholders, Needed To Address A Benchmark Underperformance.

The healthcare organization or interprofessional team leadership, healthcare providers, support personnel, and relevant departments are the relevant stakeholders to work on improving the specified benchmark statistic. These stakeholders must act because underperformance in the benchmark has a direct impact on the quality of treatment and patient outcomes. The stakeholder ethical roles in assisting higher benchmark performance include:

  • Providing additional resources such as funds, workforce and technology to help the underperforming benchmark improve.
  • Giving healthcare providers and support personnel continual training and development opportunities to ensure they have the skills and information needed to increase performance in the goal area.
  • Improving benchmark performance by using evidence-based procedures and methods.
  • Promoting a culture of continuous improvement and innovation inside the organization, as well as including all stakeholders in the improvement process.
  • Collaborating with other organizations and community resources to pool resources and knowledge and exchange best practices for increasing performance in the target area.
  • Monitoring and reviewing the status of improvement initiatives regularly and making modifications as needed to guarantee that benchmark performance continues to improve.
  • The healthcare organization or interprofessional team may improve the overall quality of treatment and patient outcomes by doing these ethical and sustainable measures, which is the ultimate objective of any healthcare institution.

References

American Diabetes Association. (2020). 1. Improving care and promoting health in populations: Standards of Medical Care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care, 43(Suppl 1), S7–S13. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S001

Amini-Rarani, M., Karimi, S., & Gharacheh, L. (2022). Descriptive phenomenology study of the reasons for the low uptake of free health service packages among type II diabetic patients. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1555. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08953-9

Appil, R., Sjattar, E. L., Yusuf, S., & Kadir, K. (2022). Effect of family empowerment on HbA1c levels and healing of diabetic foot ulcers. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 21(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620930120

Berdahl, C. T., Easterlin, M. C., Ryan, G., Needleman, J., & Nuckols, T. K. (2021). Primary care physicians’ conceptualization of quality in Medicare’s Merit-Based Incentive Payment System. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM, 34(3), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200555

Buitinga, M., Cohrs, C. M., Eter, W. A., Claessens-Joosten, L., Frielink, C., Bos, D., Sandker, G., Brom, M., Speier, S., & Gotthardt, M. (2020). Noninvasive monitoring of glycemia-induced regulation of GLP-1R expression in Murine and human islets of Langerhans. Diabetes, 69(11), 2246–2252. https://doi.org/10.2337/db20-0616

Casadei, G., Filippini, M., & Brognara, L. (2021). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a biomarker for diabetic foot peripheral neuropathy. Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases9010016

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Assessment 1 Instructions: Dashboard Metrics Evaluation
• PRINT
• Write a 3-5 page report for a senior leader that communicates your evaluation of current organizational or interprofessional team performance, with respect to prescribed benchmarks set forth by government laws and policies at the local, state, and federal levels.

Introduction
In the era of health care reform, many of the laws and policies set forth by government at the local, state, and federal levels have specific performance benchmarks related to care delivery outcomes that organizations must achieve. It is critical for organizational success that the interprofessional care team is able to understand reports and dashboards that display the metrics related to performance and compliance benchmarks.
Maintaining standards and promoting quality in modern health care are crucial, not only for the care of patients, but also for the continuing success and financial viability of health care organizations. In the era of health care reform, health care leaders must understand what quality care entails and how quality in health care connects to the standards set forth by relevant federal, state, and local laws and policies. Understanding relevant benchmarks that result from these laws and policies and how they relate to quality care and regulatory standards is also vitally important.
Health care is a dynamic, complex, and heavily regulated industry. For this reason, you will be expected to constantly scan the external environment for emerging laws, new regulations, and changing industry standards. You may discover that as new policies are enacted into law, ambiguity in interpretation of various facets of the law may occur. Sometimes, new laws conflict with preexisting laws and regulations, or unexpected implementation issues arise, which may warrant further clarification from lawmakers. Adding partisan politics and social media to the mix can further complicate understanding of the process and buy-in from stakeholders.

Health care is a dynamic, complex, and heavily regulated industry. For this reason, you will be expected to constantly scan the external environment for emerging laws, new regulations, and changing industry standards. You may discover that as new policies are enacted into law, ambiguity in interpretation of various facets of the law may occur. Sometimes, new laws conflict with preexisting laws and regulations, or unexpected implementation issues arise, which may warrant further clarification from lawmakers. Adding partisan politics and social media to the mix can further complicate understanding of the process and buy-in from stakeholders.
Instructions
Choose one of the following two options for a performance dashboard to use as the basis for your evaluation:
Option 1: Dashboard Metrics Evaluation Simulation
Use the data presented in your Assessment 1 Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation activity as the basis for your evaluation.
Note: The writing you do as part of the simulation could serve as a starting point to build upon for this assessment.
Option 2: Actual Dashboard
Use an actual dashboard from a professional practice setting for your evaluation. If you decide to use actual dashboard metrics, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:
• The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.
• The specific type of care delivery.
• The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.
• The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.
Note: Ensure your data are Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.
To complete this assessment:
5. Review the performance dashboard metrics in your Assessment 1 Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation activity, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Consider the metrics that are falling short of the prescribed benchmarks. Note: The writing you do as part of the simulation could serve as a starting point to build upon for this assessment.
6. Write a report for a senior leader that communicates your evaluation of current organizational or interprofessional team performance, with respect to prescribed benchmarks set forth by government laws and policies at the local, state, and federal levels. In addition, advocate for ethical and sustainable action to address benchmark underperformance and explain the potential for improving the overall quality of care and performance, as reflected on the performance dashboard.
7. Make sure your report meets the Report Requirements listed below. Structure it so that it will be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need, and be sure to cite the relevant health care policies or laws when evaluating metric performance against established benchmarks.
Report Requirements
The report requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
• Evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.
o Which metrics are not meeting the benchmark for the organization?
o What are the local, state, or federal health care policies or laws that establish these benchmarks?
o What conclusions can you draw from your evaluation?
o Are there any unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty where additional information could improve your evaluation?
• Analyze the consequence(s) of not meeting prescribed benchmarks and the impact this has on health care organizations or teams.
o Consider the following examples:
o Organizational mission and vision.
o Resources.
o Staffing.
o Financial: Operational and capital funding.
o Logistical considerations: Physical space.
o Support services (any ancillary department that gives support to a specific care unit in the organization, such as pharmacy, cleaning services, dietary, et cetera).
o Cultural diversity in the community.
o Staff skills.
o Procedures and processes.
o Address the following:
o What are the challenges that may potentially contribute to benchmark underperformance?
o What assumptions underlie your conclusions?
• Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.
o Focus on the benchmark you chose to target for improvement. Which metric is underperforming its benchmark by the greatest degree?
o State the benchmark underperformance that is the most widespread throughout the organization or interprofessional team.
o State the benchmark that affects the greatest number of patients.
o Include how this underperformance will affect the community that the organization serves.
o Include the greatest opportunity to improve the overall quality of care or performance of the organization or interpersonal team and, ultimately, to improve patient outcomes, as you think about the issue and the current poor benchmark outcomes.
• Advocate for ethical and sustainable action(s), directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, needed to address a benchmark underperformance.
o Who would be an appropriate group of stakeholders to act on improving your identified benchmark metric?
o Why should the stakeholder group take action?
o What are some ethical actions the stakeholder group could take that support improved benchmark performance?
• Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
o Proofread your report, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your evaluation and analysis.
• Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
o Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.
Report Format and Length
Format your report using APA style.
• Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] to help you in writing and formatting your report. Be sure to include:
o A title and references page. An abstract is not required.
o Appropriate section headings.
• Your report should be 3–5 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Supporting Evidence
Cite 4–6 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your analysis of challenges, evaluation of potential for improvement, and your advocacy for ethical action.
Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your report to your ePortfolio.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
• Competency 1: Analyze relevant health care laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.
o Analyze the consequence(s) of not meeting prescribed benchmarks and the impact this has on health care organizations or teams.
• Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.
o Advocate for ethical and sustainable action(s), directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, needed to address a benchmark underperformance.
• Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform health care laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.
o Evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.
o Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a health care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving quality or performance.
• Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
o Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
o Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Dashboard Metrics Evaluation Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. Does not evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. Evaluates dashboard metrics not clearly associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies, leading to unsubstantiated conclusions about organizational performance. Evaluates dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. Provides an objective, accurate evaluation of dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. Clearly articulates organizational performance shortfalls and any gaps in information affecting the evaluation.
Analyze the consequence(s) of not meeting prescribed benchmarks and the impact this has on health care organizations or teams. Does not identify the consequence(s) of not meeting prescribed benchmarks and the impact this has on health care organizations or teams. Identifies the consequence(s) of not meeting prescribed benchmarks and the impact this has on health care organizations or teams. Analyzes the consequence(s) of not meeting prescribed benchmarks and the impact this has on health care organizations or teams. Analyzes the consequence(s) of not meeting prescribed benchmarks and the impact this has on health care organizations or teams. Identifies clear implications of such consequences for the organization or team and acknowledges assumptions underlying the analysis.
Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a health care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving quality or performance. Does not evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Conducts an evaluation of a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that misinterprets or overlooks factors that are key to a clear understanding of the potential for improving overall quality or performance. Evaluates a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Evaluates a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Provides a compelling and fully substantiated argument for the chosen benchmark’s potential impact on quality of performance.
Advocate for ethical and sustainable action(s), directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, needed to address a benchmark underperformance. Does not advocate for ethical and sustainable action(s) needed to address a benchmark underperformance. Advocates for ethical and sustainable action(s) needed to address a benchmark underperformance. Advocates for ethical and sustainable action(s), directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, needed to address a benchmark underperformance. Advocates for ethical and sustainable action(s), directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, needed to address a benchmark underperformance. Argues effectively for recommended actions underscored by a clear and perceptive explanation of the ethical principles and sustainability goals to guide such actions.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Does not organize content for ideas to flow logically with smooth transitions. Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Organizes content so clarity is enhanced and all ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Does not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Does not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.

 

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Essay

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?