Presentation: Identifying Interprofessional Stakeholders
Presentation: Identifying Interprofessional Stakeholders
As an advanced registered nurse, you will serve as a leader within your organization. Part of this role will entail being a change agent, and spurring positive change on behalf of patients, colleagues, and the industry.
Consider a situation you experienced previously where change did not go as planned in your health care organization. Create a 10-15-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you will assess the situation and the steps that should have been taken to successfully implement change.
Describe the background of the situation, including the rationale for and goal(s) of the change.
Identify the key interprofessional stakeholders (both internal and external) that should be involved in change efforts.
Discuss an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results.
Outline how you would initiate the change.
Describe the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again, and potential steps the interprofessional team could take if the change is unsuccessful.
Make sure to include slide notes of 100-250 words for each slide.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using s, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric:
Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) | Satisfactory (88.00%) | Good (92.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
Implementing Change with an Interprofessional Approach Presentation | 100.0% | ||||||||
Background of the Situation, Including the Rationale for Change and the Goal or Goals of Change | 10.0% | A description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and the goal or goals of change, is not included. | A description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and the goal or goals of change, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and goal or the goals of change, is present. | A description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and the goal or goals of change, is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive description of the background of the situation, including the rationale for change and the goal or goals of change, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
Presentation: Identifying interprofessional stakeholders | |||||||||
Key Internal and External Interprofessional Stakeholders That Should Be Involved in Change Efforts | 10.0% | A discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is not included. | A discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is present. | A discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive discussion of the key internal and external interprofessional stakeholders that should be involved in change efforts is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
Appropriate Change Theory or Model That Could Be Used to Achieve Results | 10.0% | A discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is not included. | A discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is present. | A discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive discussion of an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
Outline for Initiating Change | 10.0% | An outline for initiating change is not included. | An outline for initiating change is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | An outline for initiating change is present. | An outline for initiating change is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive outline for initiating change is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
Impact to the Organization if the Change Initiative Is Unsuccessful Again and Potential Steps the Interprofessional Team Could Take | 5.0% | A discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is not included.
Presentation: Identifying interprofessional stakeholders |
A discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is present. | A discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive discussion of the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again and potential steps the interprofessional team could take is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
Required Sources | 5.0% | Sources are not included. | Number of required sources is only partially met. | Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. | Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | |||
Presentation of Content | 20.0% | The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. | The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. The project includes some persuasive information. | The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
Presentation: Identifying interprofessional stakeholders |
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. The project includes persuasive information from reliable sources. | The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. | |||
Layout | 10.0% | The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. | The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. | The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. | The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. | The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. | |||
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | 10.0% | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. | |||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. | Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. | Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. | |||
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
Total Weightage | 100% |