Week 5 Assignment 2: Muddiest Point and Peer Feedback Paper

Week 5 Assignment 2: Muddiest Point and Peer Feedback Paper

 Muddiest Point and Peer Feedback

Any successful plan needs feedback and guidance. In pursuing a personal legislative agenda, strategic preparation, teamwork, and an in-depth understanding of the stakeholders in the healthcare advocacy space are also as important. Like other healthcare professionals, nurses are committed to improving public health through healthcare policies and are therefore compelled to seek and address critical concerns through the legislative process (Chiu et al., 2021). During the process, one learns from the experiences and insights of their colleagues when debating on the respective legislative agendas. Better negotiations on the complexities of healthcare policy are built on the successes of previous lobbying efforts through enlisting the help of peers. Identifying and engaging relevant stakeholders can increase the collective volume, forge new alliances, and push for substantive reform in healthcare law (Beck et al., 2021). In this discussion, I request your essential ideas, advice, clarification, and knowledge on Personal Legislative Agenda, particularly the proposed policy change for COPD patients in North Carolina.

Question 1: considering smoking cessation among COPD patients, what strategies have been influential in the past in addressing similar issues?

The Personal Legislative Agenda focused on changing the policy for COPD patients in North Carolina. There is a particular interest in learning from experiences and insights about effective ways to advocate for similar healthcare problems. One can improve their advocacy efforts and raise the likelihood of reaching desired outcomes by being aware of the tactics that have worked in the past (Bachynsky, 2019). Do you think the coalition-building approach is successful? I am interested in learning more about how you have effectively forged partnerships and alliances with businesses, healthcare providers, and local leaders to amplify your voice and make your agenda more visible. I will be able to lobby for policy change for patients with COPD in North Carolina by utilizing the pooled resources, expertise, and networks and by knowing the stages required in forming effective coalitions.

Does healthcare advocacy involve the use of data and evidence? Given the significance of evidence-based approaches (Osingada & Porta, 2020), I would like to learn more about how one gathers and uses pertinent facts to support their position and make it persuasive to decision-makers. I will be guided in performing insightful study and evaluation to support my agenda by understanding the data types that have successfully campaigned for similar healthcare issues.

How crucial are outreach and strategic communication for healthcare advocacy? Do you have any expertise in this area? How have you adapted your messaging for various target audiences, including politicians, stakeholders, and the general public? The advocate will be able to better explain the policy change’s significance for COPD patients in North Carolina through knowledge, appropriate communication methods, and generating awareness among the people. Besides the project’s long-term purpose, suggestions about sustaining perseverance and a long-term perspective in healthcare activism are welcome. Understanding how you have maintained your efforts and developed relationships with policymakers and their teams can be crucial because change frequently takes time. I want to learn how you kept current on political events and recognized chances to impact decisions.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Question 2: What are the practical steps and strategies involved in developing a legislative agenda and effectively advocating for policy changes at the state or federal level?

Careful planning and strategic execution are required to develop a policy and guarantee its implementation. For instance, The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS), 2023) has a strategy to support service clients who want to quit smoking by fostering an environment free from stimuli to use tobacco products. One can improve their technique and increase the effectiveness of lobbying activities by developing a more excellent grasp of the actions that can be made while forming a legislative agenda. Peers’ experiences and knowledge in this field would be beneficial in pointing toward practical tactics that have worked in the past. Gaining knowledge from your experiences and lessons gained will enable a more assured and focused approach to the legislative process.

Understanding how the difficulties of navigating legislative agendas and policy advocacy have been handled in the past is necessary. What concrete actions did you take to raise awareness of the proposed policy change? How did you interact with important decision-makers and stakeholders? Did you have any problems or roadblocks along the way? If so, how did you get through them? A well-informed and focused approach that can optimize the possibilities of success for the suggested policy change is shaped by insights.

Conclusion

For a personal legislative agenda to be successful, it is imperative to ask for feedback and guidance. Teamwork, stakeholder knowledge, and strategic planning are crucial. Enhancing efforts and raising the likelihood of success can be accomplished by learning from peers’ experiences and thoughts on successful advocacy techniques. Creating coalitions, applying evidence-based approaches, thoughtful communication, and persistence are essential for promoting changes to healthcare policy. These components can be used to increase voices, involve decision-makers, and promote substantive healthcare legislation reform.

References

Bachynsky, N. (2019). Implications for policy: The triple aim, quadruple aim, and interprofessional collaboration. Nursing Forum, 55(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12382

Beck, A. F., Marcil, L. E., Klein, M. D., Sims, A. M., Parsons, A. A., Shah, A. N., Riley, C. L., Bignall, O. N. R., Henize, A. W., Kahn, R. S., & Unaka, N. I. (2021). Pediatricians contributing to poverty reduction through clinical-community partnership and collective action: A narrative review. Academic Pediatrics, 21(8), S200–S206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.04.010

Chiu, P., Cummings, G. G., Thorne, S., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2021). Policy advocacy and nursing organizations: A scoping review. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 22(4), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544211050611

Osingada, C. P., & Porta, C. M. (2020). Nursing and sustainable development goals (SDGs) in a COVID‐19 world: The state of the science and a call for nursing to lead. Public Health Nursing, 37(5), 799–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12776

The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS). (2023, March 15). North Carolina standard plan, tailored plan and LME/MCO tobacco-free policy requirement | NC Medicaid. Medicaid.ncdhhs.gov. https://medicaid.ncdhhs.gov/blog/2023/03/15/north-carolina-standard-plan-tailored-plan-and-lmemco-tobacco-free-policy-requirement#:~:text=Breathe%20Easy%20NC%3A%20Becoming%20Tobacco%20Free%20is%20a%20statewide%20initiative

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

 

WEEK FIVE DISCUSSION # 2 INSTRUCTIONS
MUDDIEST POINT AND PEER FEEDBACK

Feedback and guidance are an integral part of any successful plan. Accessing the expertise, experience, and ideas of others allows us to fully examine topics and plans to ensure no stone is left unturned.
For this Discussion, you will utilize the expertise of your colleagues to assist you in developing your Personal Legislative Agenda. You will construct 1-2 questions regarding any areas of concerns or guidance for colleague support and suggestion.
LEARNING RESOURCES TO ASSIST WITH ASSIGNMENT
• Dawes, D. E. (2020). The political determinants of health. Johns Hopkins University Press.
o Chapter 5, “Wining the Game That Never Ends: Success Means Continuous Employment of the Political Determinants of Health” (pp. 112–130)
• Porche, D. J. (2023). Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
o Chapter 12, “Evidence Informing Policymaking ” (pp. 175–183)
o Chapter 15, “Politics: Theory and Practice” (pp. 201–237)
• Document: Personal Legislative Agenda and Action Plan Exemplar (Word Document)Download Personal Legislative Agenda and Action Plan Exemplar (Word Document)
• Alliance for Strong Families and Communities. (2019). Policy, advocacy, and communications toolkit. https://alliance1.org/web/resources/pubs/policy-advocacy-communications-toolkit.aspx
• Association of Public Health Nurses Public Health Policy Committee. (2021). Public health policy advocacy guidebook and tool kitLinks to an external site.. https://www.phnurse.org/assets/docs/APHN%20Public%20Health%20Policy%20Advocacy%20Guidebook%20and%20Toolkit%20_May%202021.pdf
• Congress.govLinks to an external site.. (2022). https://www.congress.gov/
• Congress.gov. (2022). State legislative websitesLinks to an external site. [Interactive media]. https://www.congress.gov/state-legislature-websites
• Gustafson, A. (2017, December 12). How to be a political influence—as an average citizen. CurrentsLinks to an external site.. https://smea.uw.edu/currents/how-to-be-a-political-influence-as-an-average-citizen/
• Rees, A. (2013, August 6). Digital and online activismLinks to an external site.. Reset: Digital for Good. https://en.reset.org/digital-and-online-activism/
• White, N. (2018). Introduction: Why read the Effective Activist Guide. In Effective activist: An evidence-based guide to progressive social changeLinks to an external site. (pp. 6–10). Effective Activist. https://effectiveactivist.com/intro/

POST A RESPONSE DETAILING THE FOLLOWING
Construct one to two (1–2) questions for your colleagues detailing any questions or concerns you may have regarding the Personal Legislative Agenda. Your questions should clearly describe areas you may need clarification and/or guidance for the continuation of your work on the Personal Legislative Agenda.